by BJ Omanson
(work in progress)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Excerpt:
To my way of thinking, for as long as I can remember, land and literature were as inseparable as root and stem. Raised as I was ‘in the middle of nowhere,’ in the vast agricultural flatlands of north-central Illinois, the land was the source of everything—so much so that even after years of exposure to Modernist and post-Modernist ideas, any branch of the arts that was not derived from the land in some essential way tended to strike me as hollow, if not bogus. The land was inescapable. Not just for me, unregenerate rube that I was, but for everyone who walked the earth, academics and artists included, whether they recognized it or not.
Of course, to express such ideas in the second half of the 20th century in a university setting— where the very notion of “regionalism” had become something of a standing joke— was to invite derision, often to the point where I felt like an unrepentant pagan in a fundamentalist church. But my perception of the land was not something I could change. It was ingrained, a part of my blood and brain. It was who I was, due to where I was from.
Regionalism was passe. It had been a force in the late 19th century, the early 20th, and briefly during the 1930s, but its day was long past, its vital energy spent. A key reason it was no longer an influence in the arts was that regional distinctions, due to a whole host of historical and cultural changes (radio, television, the interstate highway system, popular culture, etc., etc), had been blurred out of existence. The old local characteristics had melted away.
That was the general view at mid-century, at least in the universities. But Modernity’s largess was never evenly dispersed. In many rural backwaters across the country such changes had only faintly registered. When my German grandmother rode down from Illinois with her son to visit her relations in southeastern Kentucky in the early 1950s, nearly all of the roads were still gravel or dirt and some of her relatives could only be reached by driving up dry creekbeds. And in the place where I was born in 1950, in the valley of the upper Spoon River in Stark County, Illinois, where both my father and his father had been born, life was proceeding much as it had for decades. The elders who helped to raise me— four grandparents and a host of grand-uncles and aunts— were nearly all born in the 19th century. Many were more at home driving a team than a car, and most had grandfathers who had fought in the Civil War. My German grandfather had two uncles who had fought for the Union. The modern world was encroaching, to be sure: in my Swedish grandparents’ farmhouse there was a small television in the parlor for watching the weather report each evening, and Lawrence Welk on Sundays, but my grandmother still did the laundry by hand with a wringer and two aluminum tubs, and she once told me that she missed cooking on her wood-burning range which was still kept in the basement. Virtually everything that came to our table—meat, dairy, vegetables, fruit—was grown and prepared right there on the farm, or garnered from the woods. I watched my father and uncle butcher a hog for the family larder every fall, and my mother and aunts sitting in the front yard plucking chickens. Shirts and overalls were still patched, socks still darned, and even a few dresses (and some of my own clothes), still cut and sewn from feedsacks that came in lovely patterns. The modern world was encroaching, to be sure— but in countless small ways, and in most ways that mattered, it kept its distance until I was well into my twenties.
That was my experience, which must seem marginal now, but it was hardly unique at the time. The funeral bells for American regionalism that began tolling in earnest in the 1950s in the universities were premature— the result of an insular, ivy-league perspective that had lost sight of America’s hinterlands. My experience of growing up in a world that was still distinctly regional, of extended families whose collective memory stretched back to the previous century, and whose way of life was far more traditional than modern, was by no means unusual— never mind how remote we might have seemed from the lofty vantage of academia in those years. If you were born in the 1940s or early ‘50s anywhere among the small towns or farms of rural America or, for that matter, in any of the established ethnic neighborhoods of larger cities, your experience would almost certainly have been similar. A friend of mine, also born at mid-century, the grand-daughter of Greek immigrants, was raised in a multi-lingual Boston neighborhood where the culture was still noticeably Old World and where, for instance, she was not permitted to use the telephone before she was 16. We met in the wilds of the Olympic Peninsula in the early 1970s as part of the off-the-grid, back-to-the-land movement and discovered, despite the obvious differences in our backgrounds, that our early experiences had much in common.
My point is that many writers who are alive now, who are in their 70s or 80s and still writing, spent their formative years in regions of America that remained distinctive and deeply rooted in a much older America. We still remember and we still carry that older America in our veins. We have been writing and publishing now for decades and we’re not dead yet— or if we are, our graves are still warm and our voices, attenuated to whispers, can still be heard.






.jpg)




















